When demand is low at night, wind farms sometimes have to give away power. But it's rare. (Photo by Nic McPhee via Creative Commons)

When demand is low at night, wind farms sometimes have to give away power. But it's rare. (Photo by Nic McPhee via Creative Commons)

Why wind farms sometimes pay to get rid of power

Wind farms on the wrong side of a congested transmission line sometimes can’t give away the power they produce.

Instead, they have to pay someone to take it off their hands.

Negative prices are a rare quirk in the wholesale electricity market. They usually occur at night in areas with lots of wind, nuclear or hydropower and not enough customers or transmission to absorb it all.

After California, the Midwest’s regional electricity grid has the second most-frequent occurrences of negative wholesale prices, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration.

It’s still not very common. On the hourly day-ahead market managed by the Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator (MISO), negative prices occur just over 0.02 percent of the time.

Each day, MISO’s computers ask generators in the region how much electricity they can provide the following day, and at what price. Algorithms then determine the most cost-effective mix of sources to reliably match the demand forecasts.

Wind farms earn $22 per megawatt hour from the federal production tax credit, and so they’ll often offer to pay anything up to that amount to keep their turbines spinning rather than curtail generation.

“Even if they were paying us $21 a megawatt hour, they would still be making a dollar, if they get a tax credit of $22,” says Joe Gardner, MISO’s executive director of real time operations

Gardner speculated that negative prices are more common in the Midwest than other regional markets because of the large amount of wind on the system, though it’s not exclusively wind that’s affected.

It’s expensive to shut down and restart a nuclear generator or large coal unit, and so sometimes operators of those plants will choose to pay negative prices for a short period of time rather than interrupt generation.

More transmission lines could lower the frequency of negative prices, but building enough new capacity to completely do away with them wouldn’t be affordable, says Melissa Seymour, director of regional markets and regulation for Iberdrola Renewables, which operates more than 1,800 megawatts of wind farms in Iowa, Minnesota and the Dakotas.

Seymour says negative prices send the right economic signals to generators, and they help keep costs down for electricity customers by discouraging unnecessary generation.

“It’s not a bad thing,” she says. “Now do we like them all the time? No. Sometimes it can be painful, but I think it’s really working.”

2 thoughts on “Why wind farms sometimes pay to get rid of power

  1. So….too much wind at times. But, we need to double the wind resources to meet the RPS standards….. is this logical?

  2. “So…too much wind at times. But…is this logical?”
    The articles reports negative prices at two hundredths of one percent of the time. The rest of the time (ninety-nine point ninety-eight percent of the year), not so much. So…what do you think, Mr. Skidd? Math much?