Study: Patchwork of state, county laws holding back wind development

© 2015 E&E Publishing LLC, republished with permission

Inconsistency in state and local zoning for commercial wind farms has created a patchwork of laws and regulations that could hinder the industry’s growth even in wind-rich states, according to a newly released analysis from the Nebraska-based Center for Rural Affairs.

A review of laws and regulations from four states – Iowa, Minnesota, Nebraska and Wisconsin – found that zoning of wind energy “remains generally uncoordinated and subject to [both] state and local regulations, resulting in a piecemeal approach where zoning standards vary between states and within states,” according to the study’s author, Alissa Doerr.

“In order for wind energy development to continue increasing, there must be an effective approach to wind energy zoning implemented that reduces inconsistency and unpredictability caused by the patchwork approach that is currently in place,” Doerr, a law extern from the University of Nebraska, said in a statement. “The key is finding the right balance between local and state control.”

Better coordination between regulatory authorities over wind farm permitting will take on increased importance as more states look to wind energy as a tool for meeting requirements under U.S. EPA’s newly released Clean Power Plan, which seeks to cut utility-sector greenhouse gas emissions by 32 percent in just 15 years.

The wind energy sector has largely welcomed the new EPA regulations, citing the renewable resource’s ability to generate utility-scale power with zero emissions. “We can build a more diverse, reliable, cleaner energy mix for America, while creating jobs and keeping money in consumers’ pockets,” Tom Kiernan, executive director of the American Wind Energy Association, said in a statement applauding the Clean Power Plan.

But to date, wind energy development has been uneven across the United States, a condition resulting in part from real and perceived differences in state and local zoning requirements.

The industry has experienced sustained growth in the Great Plains, along the Pacific Coast and in parts of the Midwest. Texas is the nation’s No. 1 producer of wind energy, with more than 15,000 megawatts of installed capacity, followed by California (6,000 MW) and Iowa (5,700 MW).

Nebraska and Wisconsin fall behind

Laggard wind power states, however, include places like Nebraska and Wisconsin, which have abundant wind energy resources but lack a clear regulatory path for developers to invest the hundreds of millions of dollars needed to bring wind energy into the mainstream of electricity generation, according to the Center for Rural Affairs analysis and other experts.

According to recent AWEA statistics, Nebraska had just over 800 MW of wind energy capacity installed in the second quarter of 2015, less than any of its neighboring states except Montana and Missouri. Wisconsin, meanwhile, reported roughly 650 MW of installed wind power capacity in early 2015. That compares with the nearly 14,000 MW of combined capacity installed in Wisconsin’s border states – Iowa, Minnesota, Illinois and Michigan.

Wisconsin, which receives 2.4 percent of its total electricity generation from wind power compared with 16 percent in Minnesota and 27 percent in Iowa, has seen its wind energy permitting process mired in legal debates, with opposition coming from local zoning boards, homebuilders and Realtors, and even boards of health.

The Wisconsin Supreme Court last month ruled against a challenge to the state’s 3-year-old wind farm siting rules, rejecting claims that turbines hurt property values. And last October, the Brown County Health Department, serving 245,000 people in Green Bay and surrounding areas, declared an eight-turbine wind farm owned by Duke Energy to be a health hazard after receiving 80 complaints about noise from the turbines over four years.

Nebraska, while having one of the top four wind energy resources in the nation, remains hampered by rules governing the state’s power generation assets, which are 100 percent publicly owned, according to the analysis.

“Consequently, Nebraska’s public power system creates these burdensome regulations that discourage wind energy development in the state, making it less competitive in the wind industry than neighboring states,” the analysis found.

93 shades of ‘unpredictability’

And once approved at the state level, wind projects must meet all local zoning ordinances in the county or city where they are to be built. With 93 counties in Nebraska, wind energy developers are faced with “unpredictability and inconsistency” in siting requirements, and the regulatory burden can be worsened if a wind farm spreads across multiple counties.

A renewable energy export analysis conducted by the Brattle Group last year for the Nebraska Power Review Board found that “Nebraska is the only state in the region to require special regulatory approvals for wind developers intending to either export their renewable power or sell it into the wholesale market.” The requirement, while meant to streamline clean energy exports, “is perceived as an intimidating additional regulatory step that is not required in other states,” the Brattle analysis found.

John Crabtree, director of media for the Center for Rural Affairs, headquartered in Lyons, Nebraska, said the organization has advocated for increased adoption of renewable energy by rural communities for some time, both as a hedge against rising energy prices but also as an economic development tool and to promote environmental sustainability.

“We think it’s vitally important to address climate change and to create a cleaner and better energy future, not just for Nebraska but for the entire country,” he said.

At the same time, the center remains a strong advocate for local decisionmaking around energy policies, noting that people who “live where we’re going to build new wind turbines and transmission lines need to have a real voice,” Crabtree said.

One thought on “Study: Patchwork of state, county laws holding back wind development

  1. I was confused why Nebraska has been so slow at wind deployment. It ranks 4th in wind power potential. I thought maybe it was land ownership issues. Nebraska farmland and grazing lands seem to be 50/50 between owner-operated and owner-non operated. I’m not sure how this fits in, but there could be issues for siting wind farms on lands where the operator lives on the property.

    Then I checked into politics. Sure enough, back in January 2015 several bills were introduced to improve wind development. Production taxation and other incentives were discussed. Of course, after more Googling, it appears that this legislation was blocked:

    On the legislation introduced in January 2015:
    http://www.knopnews2.com/home/headlines/Senators-Introduce-Bills-to-Advance-Renewable-Energy-in-Nebraska-288829681.html

    and then filibustered in May 2015

    http://www.omaha.com/news/legislature/filibuster-kills-proposed-tax-credits-for-wind-farms-other-renewable/article_5ce6710f-c762-5c6b-8e5f-a910eb815cf2.html

    So it’s politics. Here’s what the opposition said from the link above:

    “But Sen. Mike Groene of North Platte, who led the opposition to the bill, said Nebraska doesn’t need additional energy and argued that wind farm development would harm the state’s public power system.

    The wind is unpredictable, Groene said, which would force the coal-powered plants to operate below capacity when it is blowing but could not replace those plants.

    “These projects drive up the cost,” he said. “Call it a secular humanist religion that believes we have to save the planet.”
    Sen. Dan Watermeier of Syracuse said Nebraska could use the $75 million in better ways.”

    According to EIA, Nebraska has no coal and ranks in the middle compared to all states for oil and gas production. It appears to get all its coal from Wyoming. It also generates a lot of electricity via nuclear. So the status quo is what it is.