Atlas gives clearer picture of Great Lakes offshore wind potential

Editor’s note: This story has been updated to reflect the researcher’s views on the quality of previously existing wind-mapping resources.

University researchers say they have created a new detailed and accurate resource for mapping offshore wind potential in the Great Lakes, filling a void in what may still be a long process toward development.

The new “Great Lakes Wind Atlas” — developed by researchers at Cornell University and the Technical University of Denmark — claims to be the “first fully observational wind atlas” for the 150,000 square-mile region touching eight states and two Canadian provinces.

While offshore wind development in the Great Lakes has yet to move into commercial development, the researchers say it will be a vital tool in a field where “accurate wind data lives in a disjointed and disjunctive world.”

Paula Doubrawa Moreira, a Cornell doctoral candidate in engineering and lead author of the study to be published in the October edition of the journal Remote Sensing of Environment, said the atlas compiles an 11-year record of data from various sources by combining satellite-based wind speeds with point sources like buoys.

“We’ve been able to present the atlas at fine spatial accuracy,” she said in an email, adding that it will be reliable for potential project siting in the Great Lakes.

“There is no one data source that can accurately represent the wind conditions offshore,” Doubrawa Moreira said. “It is necessary to draw information from distinct data sources and combine them in a way that considers the strengths and weaknesses of each data set.”

Such measurements are available throughout the world, she added, “but they are not taken advantage of fully. Our work seeks to draw attention to the potential in these data sets, as well as to provide academia and industry with the tools they need to start taking advantage of these observational resources.”

(click for larger version)

(click for larger version)

Specifically, the researchers made the atlas using information gathered at weather stations, buoys, a NASA satellite that collects wind information over water and other satellites with synthetic aperture radar, or SAR.

It found strong potential in the north-central area of Lake Michigan and along the southern coast of Lake Superior.

In 2010, the National Renewable Energy Laboratory estimated about 740 gigawatts of potential offshore wind capacity in the Great Lakes. Also in 2010, the U.S. Department of Energy reported the average cost of offshore wind was 27 cents per kilowatt-hour compared to 9 cents for onshore wind. By 2020, it had projected the costs to drop to 10 cents per kilowatt-hour.

Great Lakes wind is ‘inevitable’

Developing offshore wind in the Great Lakes has until now been a challenge for developers due to costs, a lack of infrastructure and public perception.

The only project in development — an 18-megawatt pilot seven miles off the coast of Lake Erie near Cleveland — is moving forward despite losing out on millions in federal grants to projects on the east coast.

“The fundamentals of the project are as strong, if not stronger,” the head of the Lake Erie project told Midwest Energy News last year.

Stanley “Skip” Pruss, co-founder of the Lansing, Michigan-based consulting firm 5 Lakes Energy, said the wind atlas is promising news that can help develop Great Lakes wind — not if, but when.

“There is very, very little information available,” about offshore wind potential in the Great Lakes, said Pruss, who was formerly Michigan’s chief energy officer under former Gov. Jennifer Granholm. Pruss was also the former chairman of the Great Lakes Offshore Wind Council.

“There is very economic onshore wind energy in Michigan in largely the entire central Lower Peninsula,” Pruss said in terms of development. “On offshore wind, we have nothing.”

The Michigan Alternative and Renewable Energy Center in West Michigan launched an offshore wind assessment project in 2011 that included a buoy that collected wind speeds at multiple altitudes nearly seven miles off the Lake Michigan coast. It was removed in 2013.

“Generally speaking, we were reasonably confident the wind resource was pretty good,” Pruss said following the three-year research phase.

Going forward, the data from the wind atlas “will be tremendously useful,” Pruss said.

“Offshore wind in the Great Lakes is going to be a function of economics, with the biggest challenge being the visual aesthetics,” Pruss said, referring to strong public backlash in some parts of the state when developers proposed a major project in 2009 that never got off the ground.

The Offshore Wind Council identified five areas in the Great Lakes that could be suitable for offshore wind development, Pruss said, including an area in the middle of Lake Michigan that’s “really quite shallow” and that could avoid the aesthetics issue because it’s far enough out from the coast.

“It’s clear there were some communities more amenable to wind development off their coastlines than others,” Pruss said. “What really has to be done once the economics work is public engagement and public education. Without engagement first and public education, siting anything in the Great Lakes is going to be very, very difficult. I think you can win the hearts and minds if you do it early and do it a lot.”

With a push for more wind development — onshore and offshore — during the Granholm administration, those efforts “fell apart” after Republican Gov. Rick Snyder was elected in 2010, with all of the commercial development onshore, particularly in Michigan’s Thumb region.

Additionally, onshore wind has been far more economical in Michigan than offshore, Pruss said. But with greater efforts devoted to mitigating climate change and decarbonizing the U.S. energy supply, Pruss said it may be 10 years before offshore wind development is considered a viable alternative in the Great Lakes.

Before that, the region will need to build the port infrastructure to deploy and service turbines, develop transmission systems and do a full assessment of wildlife risks and mapping the contours of likely places to build, Pruss said.

“This new tool is definitely something that will be very, very useful,” Pruss said. “I don’t want to sound overly pessimistic. I believe offshore wind in the Great Lakes is inevitable.”

4 thoughts on “Atlas gives clearer picture of Great Lakes offshore wind potential

  1. In the 25th of 26 paragraphs Blaskovitz finally mentioned the matter of wildlife. We need to be honest with ourselves about how solar and wind effect wildlife. If we got regular reports of bird death, desert flora & fauna losses for solar arrays, etc. we would have so much better a way to evaluate our insatiable energy needs. Instead, people enamored of sustainable energy seem to be pretending that there is no tradeoff. (Back in the ’70s we couldn’t afford a thorough study of the algae of L.Superior. So, I guess if we don’t know about the “assessment of wildlife risks” we can all be complacent about what we will lose with offshore wind in L.Huron & L.Michigan.)

    Who did a study of the wildlife above and in the ‘. . . area in the middle of Lake Michigan that’s “really quite shallow” and that could avoid the aesthetics issue because it’s far enough out from the coast.’? I wonder if the birds and benthos that will be killed care about “the aesthetics issue.”

    Who is “. . . the head of the Lake Erie Project”? Nice that Blaskovitz left that out as well as name of their company. Mr. Blaskovitz knows when to censor himself. Someone will cash in big, and they are the ones the government listens to.

    About the funding for the “Atlas Project”: Obviously it is not commercial funding as “. . . wind development in the Great Lakes has yet to move into commercial development, the researchers say it will be a vital tool . . ..” Just on speculation, because I don’t know where the funding is coming from, my guess is that the government (you and me, folks) is paying for a good chunk of it. Then we can pay to research the engineering for the project and when it’s already to go we can subsidize construction and perhaps even provide the insurance, as we do for nuclear. (Maybe the same company, whose name we don’t know, that is working in L.Erie will be the fortunate profiteers.) Do you know an insurance company that is looking to insure people on a rig in the middle of L.Michigan doing this dangerous work? (Remember the Edmund Fitzgerald)

    I have to go along with the belief that development of wind in the NA Great Lakes is inevitable. But lets go slow. What is the best way to protect the a great biological and geological and aesthetic resource? Humans are way down the list of organisms that use it.

  2. Mr Balaskovitz: forgive me for misspelling your name. Jan Boudart

  3. Jan: Follow the link on “18-megawatt pilot” and it will tell you more about the Lake Erie project.

  4. the huge potential of this off-shore resource is mind blowing. With over 740 Gigawatts of potential in the lakes, the future can be bright. The Icebreaker project in Lake Erie is working to test a new anchor system, and new turbine designs with shrouds offer both higher outputs and a way to screen out flying birds. Ohio and Michigan have the manufacturing that can lead this field, and the change from over heated water to a few birds lost would possibly be a great benefit to the wildlife in the lakes.