Lessons from Germany’s aggressive path to integrate renewables on the grid

Editor’s note: This is Part Five of a series on climate and energy issues in Germany and Poland that could help inform policy discussions in Ohio and other parts of the United States. Kathiann M. Kowalski’s recent research trip to Germany and Poland was made possible by a Transatlantic Media Fellowship from the Heinrich Böll Foundation.

Part One: In Poland, efforts to rescue coal industry will likely come up short
Part Two: Restrictive new law will harm Poland’s wind industry, advocates say
Part Three: In Poland, an Ohioan finds a parallel world on climate policy
Part Four: German utilities’ clean-energy transition offers insights for Ohio

As policymakers in Ohio and elsewhere look to modernize their aging electric grid, concepts in Germany’s changing energy system suggest how today’s decisions can set the stage for a greater share of renewables and more energy security.

Almost a third of Germany’s electricity already comes from renewable energy, primarily wind and solar power.

That’s just over the 30 percent that grid operator PJM has said the regional grid —which includes Ohio and all or parts of a dozen other states — could already handle over the next decade. Yet it’s still far below the 80 percent of renewables that current technologies could handle by 2050 in every region of the United States, according to a 2012 study by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory.

Nonetheless, as Germany pushes to move beyond its current level of renewables, the country faces challenges.

“We need to have a stable system where you can transport energy from the places where it’s produced to the places where it’s needed most,” said Katharina Klein, an expert on energy, climate and digitalization who has previously served as an advisor for the German Association for Energy and Water Industries (BDEW).

“Expanding the grid is a very important thing,” she continued. In her view, battery storage will also play a growing role.

“What’s maybe equally important but almost forgotten is that we have to make our grid smarter,” Klein added, “which means, on the local and regional level that our business companies need to invest in the infrastructure to make it smart enough to actually take into account renewable energy.”

‘Baseload is no longer needed’

Germany has committed to reducing its reliance on fossil fuels with a shift known as the Energiewende. The country sees the shift not only as “an important energy project, but also an important economic project,” said spokesperson Beate Baron at the Federal Ministry of Economics and Energy in Berlin. “This of course can serve as a model for other countries as well.”

Germany and other countries, including the United States, have traditionally operated their electric grids with the view that some amount of power would always be needed as “baseload” to meet constant demands placed upon the electric system, and additional power plants would ramp up or down as necessary to meet peak power needs.

Twenty-five years ago, coal and nuclear power provided the lion’s share of the energy generated in both Germany and Ohio, and those energy sources likewise provided the bulk of baseload power.

That situation might not continue if Germany’s shift towards renewables continues. Already, Baron noted, “there are hours of nearly 100 percent renewable electricity in the system.”

Consequently, she said, “baseload is no longer needed.” Otherwise, it could “block the grid.”

In fact, when peak levels of wind and solar energy reached their highest levels, power plants cut prices dramatically. On rare occasions, prices actually fell into negative numbers — so that customers were being paid to use electricity.

Instead of the current system, Germany envisions using an “Electricity Market 2.0.”

The system would move away from a capacity market focused primarily on supply-side resources to meet peak power. Rather, entities would make commitments to supply or use energy to balance the grid. And instead of running all the time, conventional fossil-fuel power plants would serve more to meet short-term needs and back-up capacity reserves.

Baron’s statements mesh with analyses done in 2015 and 2016 by the Berlin-based think-tank Agora Energiewende. Under that group’s models, wind and solar energy would provide the bulk of energy over a regional grid, with flexibility and smart retirement of conventional power plants helping to balance out the system.

Others questioned whether baseload might really be eliminated as a practical matter.

“I think there will still be some need” for baseload, said Christopher Engelmann at EnBW, one of Germany’s four large utility companies. “But to what extent? I think you could debate that.” In his view, coal-powered plants “may provide capacity markets and may also provide reactive power [for reserves], but it’s not as reliable.”

Nonetheless, the company has recently adopted a new business model focused heavily on wind power, along with grid services, electricity trading and constructing and decommissioning power plants.

After all, observed Jörg Jasper, also at EnBw, “One day renewable energies will be the conventional energies of the future.”

‘A focus on flexibility’

In order for the grid to function properly, the electricity being used at any moment must match the amount that’s being supplied. Managing that is a delicate balancing act with conventional power, and the job gets more complex with variable sources of generation, such as wind and solar.

“The new power system needs to be very flexible to integrate [the] growing share of renewables,” Baron said. “That includes smart technologies, demand-side management and also a very flexible power plant fleet [with an] ability to quickly ramp up and down.”

“You can design a system with a lot of flexibility,” agreed Stephanie Ropenus at Agora. “One of the options is the grid. You can use it basically for regional balancing.” In her view, that includes selectively adding renewable energy.

For example, renewable energy might be fed into the grid at times when it’s needed or stored in battery systems for later. Smart inverter technology to make that practical is already spreading in the United States and could lead to greater penetration of solar energy in markets there.

“Flexibility at a more local level” is another important feature for the grid, Ropenus said. When there is a lot of wind energy in the system, for example, customers in cold areas can run heat pumps or run processes that would take advantage of the ready supply in the system.

EnBW sees the need for flexibility as a potential profit center. Its management envisions offering smart solutions for maximizing energy usage, automated data collection and flexible responses to different conditions on the grid, and other services. “I think in the long run that’s even the greater opportunity for us,” said Jasper.

“And for that we need smart, flexible and adjustable IT platforms,” Jasper added. “And it’s what we will also be heavily invested in in the future.”

Implications for Ohio

Ohio’s actual share of electricity from renewable sources is far less than Germany’s — only about two percent as of 2015. Yet the overall share of renewables in the United States’ energy mix is increasing.

Although the United States is not likely to achieve the levels in Germany in the near future, renewables will catch up to and surpass coal by about 2040, according to the Energy Information Administration’s Annual Energy Outlook 2017, which was released on January 5.

Advocates such as Dick Munson at the Environmental Defense Fund are already calling for a modern grid to be designed for efficiency and a market-based system of generation that would be able to handle a larger share of renewables.

Coupling a modern grid with information technology and flexibility measures could also provide substantial gains in efficiency, Munson noted. For example, real-time energy usage data could lead to efficiency gains of 15 percent, he said.

Meanwhile, the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio has already indicated an interest in updating the state’s electric grid. Grid modernization was one reason advanced by the PUCO in October when it allowed extra charges to prop up FirstEnergy’s credit rating without requiring the company to use those funds specifically for any grid projects.

Regardless of what regulators ultimately decide in Ohio and other states, an updated grid will require large capital investments.

That raises the question of how to fairly design rates for an updated distribution grid — a situation that could rekindle attempts to undermine net metering in Ohio and elsewhere.

Meanwhile, the situation in Germany is also not fully settled, but some trends are emerging, including the need for an expanded and modernized grid.

“What you could say…is that investing in renewable energies and in grid infrastructure brings you a steady return,” Klein said.

10 thoughts on “Lessons from Germany’s aggressive path to integrate renewables on the grid

  1. The really good news is that on sunny windy days you can actually get paid to use Germany’s renewable power! I mean that is even better than free!

    Reality is that managing the grid is going to take a lot of rethinking and reworking. Personally I think re-engineering existing dams and using them for storage makes a lot of sense and is semi easy to implement in short order since it only requires making a water capture basin at the bottom and installing the pumping equipment to pump that water back in to the reservoir during excess power times.

  2. A new Environmental Progress analysis finds that “German emissions increased in 2016 for a second year in a row“, blaming the result on “the country closing one of its nuclear plants and replacing it with coal and natural gas“. Obviously wind and sun failed to step in and do the job.

    Environmental Progress reports the shocking result:
    “Not only did new solar and wind not make up for the lost nuclear, the percentage of time during 2016 that solar and wind produced electricity declined dramatically.
    Germany added a whopping 10 percent more wind turbine capacity and 2.5 percent more solar panel capacity between 2015 and 2016, but generated less than one percent more electricity from wind and generated one percent less electricity from solar.”

    Germany’s Energiewende has only succeeded in massively elevating Germany’s consumer power prices, making its power almost twice as expensive as power in neighboring France, which relies heavily on nuclear

    • Theory such as above and per AGW can be made to sound convincing but debate pulls back the vail.

      Intermittent source power will always be extremely difficult to manage and when its mismanaged wide swaths of people and industry will be damages.

  3. Battery/water storage have physical limits, and are ONLY good for the power gird… Fuel cell and, electricity to liquid fuel conversion techniques match the “battery” or other storage solution, with two great advantages, CAPACITY and alternative use of the stored energy. Overbuilding renewable to insure stability/availability of the grid, combined with electricity ->liquid fuel (or Hydrogen as a step if you need) allows the storage capacity for windless/cloudy days or excessive demand for short term, and allows renewable energy to support transport, (no airliner will run on batteries in the foreseeable future), produce feed stock for chemical processes currently dependent on oil… oh and as at least some of the current energy->liquid technologies capture CO2 we could have a net carbon negative grid.

  4. Nice read, but you’ve missed a huge difference between Ohio and Germany with respect to market design. Germany’s grid is “open access” meaning that an independent power producers (i.e. non-utility) can build a renewable power plant and connect it to the transmission system without issue. Ohio, on the other hand, is moving to re-regulate it’s power industry, so that the likes of AEP and First Energy would be the only companies able to build/own/operate power plants – renewable or otherwise. If Ohioans want to get into the renewables game, they better get in front of their legislators ASAP. The vertically-integrated regulated utilities will build wind and solar, but not to the detriment of their existing fossil-fueled power plant fleets, which they want to operate as often as possible to recover their investments. Their shareholders rightly demand this.

    No market design is perfect. Germany’s certainly has it’s flaws. But it’s a timely debate. Just yesterday, the University of Chicago’s Harris School of Public Policy released a report that found organized (i.e. “liberalized”) power markets save about $3 billion annually in generation costs. These savings are mostly attributed to the fact that lowest-cost units are dispatched when needed. Such a construct drives efficiency, which reduces emissions. Isn’t that the goal? Re-regulation is not the answer. Ohio is part of the PJM Interconnection, the largest “organized” electricity market in the world (in terms of annual MWH produced/consumed). It has all the tools it needs to build lots of renewables, like it’s neighbors in Iowa and Pennsylvania. The regulatory uncertainty is what’s holding Ohio back. Call your lawmakers today.

  5. The comments in this article about “baseload” are particularly important. My work on the MISO 2015 wind generation shows that wind can generate nearly 50% of total “baseload” with less than one percent of wind generation occurring above the “baseload” 24-hour-365-day year, whatever level it is. With about 8% of wind generation above the 24-hour per day target wind generates 63% of total power below the mark. Some of that 8% will occur when peak demand exists, but a large opportunity exists for “dispatchable load” which is far less expensive and far more important today than electricity storage.

    But one thing which I didn’t see mentioned, which must always be part of any story about Germany or other European electricity, is that the average price of electricity in Germany is two to three times higher than the average price in the U.S. It isn’t just that Germans are trying harder or are better at it than us. In fact there are arguments that the Germans lag behind several other European nations for carbon cuts. But that’s not how we ought to look at it.

    What we ought to look at is that they are spending less money than we are on permitting. They are building taller turbines (the 2015 average wind turbine in Europe was 140 meters at the hub, compared to about 100 meters in the U.S.) which costs more, and makes more profits because the higher wind reliability at higher altitudes is worth a great deal more than the additional construction cost.

    And we should always bear in mind that Ohio has enough good wind to generate several times as much electricity as it uses at today’s average wholesale price of electricity. There is no technological barrier to sustainability, and there is no economic barrier. The barriers are psychological, and informational.

  6. Germany has the highest residential electric rates in western Europe. Higher than electric rates in California! Is that really what Ohio needs??? Look what expensive utilities has done to heavy industry in California over the past 20 years.

  7. When you get the political donors out of the election process and providing benefits to elected officer holders in State and Federal governments. Biomass Digestors , burning methane in generators that exists, the use of Hydrogen fuels will develop. Hydrogen peroxide was the fuel for the land speed record, and the fuel for V2 rockets in WWII. There are solar films that can be used upon the inside of windows that capture different light rays. Think of the square footage of windows in office, commercial, public buildings that could supply low voltage needed for LED lighting.

  8. The key to integrating renewables is a robust transmission system. Please note what China is working on via this recent Economist story. – “China is well on its way to building a “regional” supergrid. If a global supergrid can be built, one which can flexibly carry energy around the planet, it will allow growing cities all over the world to tap much more renewable energy than they do currently.”
    http://www.economist.com/blogs/economist-explains/2017/01/economist-explains-10

  9. What this story does not discuss is the extent to which Germany has been using its neighbors grids for balancing. One result is that Poland, for example, is installing devices called phase shifting transformers to better regulate the unscheduled flow of power out of German’s grid and into Poland’s.

    Another thing to consider is that for all the talk about busbar costs for wind and solar that have dropped below the busbar cost of fossil-fired plants, fossil-fired backup is still needed for those days when the wind doesn’t blow and/or the sun doesn’t shine. As for expanding the grid, it’s easier in Europe than it will be in the US, where intense local opposition tends to delay major transmission projects for years.